View Full Version : us amps, spl??


simzimma
30-01-2004, 09:49 PM
sum1 said to me that us amps are poor, for sq, that they only good for spl burps? and that u can;t use them for daily drivin???

i always thought us amps had amazin sq, was i wrong??

mini_basser
30-01-2004, 09:52 PM
Who told you that? Admittedly Ive not used any of their products, but I have NEVER heard them being referred to as bad for SQ! You can certainly use them for daily driving, just turn it down :rolleyes:

They make lots of amps, more than just huge power monoblocks...

M:B

Snowie
30-01-2004, 09:57 PM
ummm. lies lies lies....

theyre great amps! some TOP sq guys run us amps... their tube amps are meant to be very special...

puggie
30-01-2004, 09:58 PM
I'll be running them for my SQ setup

Gezzza
30-01-2004, 10:00 PM
all amps sound the same anyway :confused:

simzimma
30-01-2004, 10:03 PM
thats good to hear, so i wasn;t wrong! :)

Mason
30-01-2004, 10:06 PM
The normal ones produce lots of clean power.. Which is very handy in a good sounding setup.. You'd have nothing to fear buying them for an SQ system.

Some of their amps ARE specifically for SPL burps. But no-one with an ounce of intelligence would consider using them for front speakers, or even your typical streetbass sub as they are simply too powerful.

VD
30-01-2004, 10:08 PM
well if you can get to peterborough ice direct soundoff i will demo them to you.

in the interim i would like you to read both of these independant reviews......

http://www.talkaudio.co.uk/vbb/showthread.php?t=59842

http://www.talkaudio.co.uk/vbb/showthread.php?t=60315

i think that should answer your concerns. if you need to ask any product specific questions call me on 07960 753024.

mini_basser
30-01-2004, 10:32 PM
I need to spend more time in that section: missed both of those thread before :rolleyes: Thanks for the direction VD :)

M:B

VD
30-01-2004, 10:47 PM
I would disagree a bit with Mason - there are amps that naturally suit competition usage - but even then they have very good sound quality.....the issue historically is that they were one of the main producers of "cheater amps" - high current devices that produced all their power at unattainable (for real life use) impedances.

One of the classics was the "VLX - 25". An amp rated at 25RMS at 4 ohms (2 x 12.5) that actually produced 3200 RMS at .25 ohms bridged. Bear in mind that often the subs used were SVC 4 ohm in those days.......since the power classes have been scrapped or relaxed in both SQ and SPL these days its become a tadge pointless to make amps like that - and so the high voltage topology has become more relavent - amps that do their peak power into 2 or 4 ohm bridged loads....

There is one of their sponsered guys using the USA6000 in SQ for his single 13.5 W7....i guess thats what you call headroom?

Mason
30-01-2004, 10:53 PM
Dave

I only commented that some of the range really had too much power for front speakers or your average (emphasis on the average) single sub.. I have no doubt that the SQ is still very good :)

Personally I'd not run my comps off an amp with certain protection circuits removed and no x-overs.. Others may prefer this.. :)

VD
30-01-2004, 10:56 PM
lmao!!!!!!!

meh - put a 2000x bridged into each pair of comps - a mere 3K per channel LOL!

I think it would be fairer to say that "some of the range are specifically for subwoofer usage" ;)

Mason
30-01-2004, 11:54 PM
I think it would be fairer to say that "some of the range are specifically for subwoofer usage" ;)

:) Kinda what I meant before :)
I didn't think we could really disagree on this one...

VD
31-01-2004, 12:24 AM
neither did i mason - especially after our msn convo the other night hehehe ;)

speaking of which i need to discuss things a tadge further with you over the weekend buddy! :)

Mason
02-02-2004, 02:51 PM
I was stuck in Wales on the weekend, will get in touch soon chap.